The Admissibility of Text Messages in a Business Lawsuit

Home / Blog / Business Litigation / The Admissibility of Text Messages in a Business Lawsuit
The Admissibility of Text Messages in a Business Lawsuit

Text messages may be admissible in civil lawsuits if, like any documents, it passes muster under the rules of evidence pertaining to relevance, authenticity, and reliability.

Electronically stored information (“ESI”) includes emails, texts, websites, and other online postings. So provisions have been made in the law for the admission of text messages as evidence—but only if they can be authenticated.

Typically, the authentication of evidence requires a live witness to testify to its authenticity. Such testimony is unremarkable: Q: What is exhibit 1? A: A print-out copy of a text message I received from the defendant agreeing to my ten percent commission. Done. But how do you authenticate a piece of electronic data if no witness is there to say what it is?

A recent update to the Federal Rules of Evidence now allows for two categories of ESI to be considered “self-authenticated,” meaning there is no requirement for a live witness at trial. These new categories include:

Certified Records Generated by an Electronic Process or System. A record generated by an electronic process or system that produces an accurate result, as shown by a certification of a qualified person that complies with the certification requirements of Rule 902(11) or (12). The proponent must also meet the notice requirements of 902(11).

Certified Data Copied from an Electronic Device, Storage Medium, or File. Data copied from an electronic device, storage medium or file, if authenticated by a process of digital identification, as shown by a certification of a qualified person that complies with the certification requirements of Rule 902(11) or (12). The proponent also must meet the notice requirements of 902(11).

However, authentication is just one step in getting electronic evidence admitted at trial. In addition, the evidence must be relevant, reliable, and not hearsay or unfairly prejudicial. You must also be able to establish the identity of the sender; just because a text came from someone’s cell phone does not mean the owner of that phone sent it. So courts may require additional evidence confirming the sender’s identity.

Williams Mestaz, L.L.P., provides strong legal advocacy for companies involved in general business lawsuits. We are known for using our skills, experience, and cutting-edge technology to get great results, whether after trial or through a favorable settlement. Call us today at (602) 256-9400 and schedule an appointment to meet with us about your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us, though doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. Our description of what we believe to be superior technology and how we win cases reflects our typical approach to litigation, which we believe:  (i) gives us a competitive advantage, and (ii) is responsible for any success we have had. But we do not win every case. Other lawyers may have technology or approaches that they believe gives them an advantage. Also, the results that we have obtained in other cases or that are described in our clients’ testimonials do not guarantee, promise, or predict the outcome of your case, which depends on the law, facts, and evidence specific to it.